Controversy over D66 leader Pechtold and a small gift – a penthouse in Scheveningen

While writing this article, it is worth mentioning that the author is struggling with fixing her own (rented of course) apartment. This could influence her view on the subject.

Everybody is busy trying to make a living and finding a decent apartment, but some jobs apparently come with quite some nice benefits: D66 leader Pechtold received, as a gift from a former Canadian diplomat, an apartment in Scheveningen worth 135 thousand euros.

The Pier by Kevin Coelner – who could say no to Scheveningen?

The problem here is that the Integrity Rules for MPs state that

If an arbitrary spectator could think that a private circumstance of a member might influences his or her position in a public issue, it may be advisable to include such circumstance in the register.

This means that a gift of some importance (like a penthouse) might come with strings attached, and as such should be reported in the Tweede Kamer gift register. Pechtold didn’t in fact report the gift, while he did report some smaller (way smaller) gifts such as concert tickets, vouchers and wine bottles. The Integrity Rules are not laws, though, and are evidently open to interpretation: there are no sanctions if “relevant” donations aren’t be made public, and it is up to MPs themselves to be accountable for this.

Reactions from social media were expectedly wild, especially considering that Pechtold’s party calls for maximum transparency. Pechtold, however, dismissed the discussion and the gift as a private matter, since the diplomat is indeed a friend of his for some 30 years.

The problem, according to a GeenStijl reporter, is that the gift timing is troublesome: it came in a period when the Tweede Kamer had to vote on a trade agreement between the EU and Canada (CETA), which resulted in a support from the majority of the lower house of the Dutch parliament.

Wilders calls for a full investigation on the matter, to prevent any conflicts of interest or the appearance thereof; many, however, do not expect the issue to have any consequences since a missing entry on the register is not in violation of any laws.

But the question remains: is such a register and, in general, transparency rules of any use if it is up to individual MPs to abide by them?

What do you think? Let us know in the comments!
Aurora Signorazzi
Aurora comes from the majestic Italian capital, and is working on her PhD in virology at the University of Groningen. She has been living in the Netherlands for four years and is by now familiar with many Dutch habits... But still finds plenty of reasons to be pleasantly amazed (most of the time) by this industrious country and its brutally honest inhabitants!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related posts

Latest posts

Gemeentes: what are Dutch municipalities and how do they work?

Every once in a while, we all get letters from the almighty, all-knowing, and all-seeing gemeente. It could be a letter demanding your gemeentelijke...

Going back to the Netherlands: 5 reasons why I should’ve stayed

On June 21, 2018, we landed in a very cold and wet Schiphol. That, however, did not put a damper on the excitement of...

At least 130 COVID-19 cases allowed entrance to festival: over 1000 attendees infected

A week before the Dutch government tightened measures again, 20,000 people attended the techno festival Verknipt on July 3 and 4. However, beats...

The latest Dutch news.
In your inbox.