Controversy over D66 leader Pechtold and a small gift – a penthouse in Scheveningen

While writing this article, it is worth mentioning that the author is struggling with fixing her own (rented of course) apartment. This could influence her view on the subject.

Everybody is busy trying to make a living and finding a decent apartment, but some jobs apparently come with quite some nice benefits: D66 leader Pechtold received, as a gift from a former Canadian diplomat, an apartment in Scheveningen worth 135 thousand euros.

The Pier by Kevin Coelner – who could say no to Scheveningen?

The problem here is that the Integrity Rules for MPs state that

If an arbitrary spectator could think that a private circumstance of a member might influences his or her position in a public issue, it may be advisable to include such circumstance in the register.

This means that a gift of some importance (like a penthouse) might come with strings attached, and as such should be reported in the Tweede Kamer gift register. Pechtold didn’t in fact report the gift, while he did report some smaller (way smaller) gifts such as concert tickets, vouchers and wine bottles. The Integrity Rules are not laws, though, and are evidently open to interpretation: there are no sanctions if “relevant” donations aren’t be made public, and it is up to MPs themselves to be accountable for this.

Reactions from social media were expectedly wild, especially considering that Pechtold’s party calls for maximum transparency. Pechtold, however, dismissed the discussion and the gift as a private matter, since the diplomat is indeed a friend of his for some 30 years.

The problem, according to a GeenStijl reporter, is that the gift timing is troublesome: it came in a period when the Tweede Kamer had to vote on a trade agreement between the EU and Canada (CETA), which resulted in a support from the majority of the lower house of the Dutch parliament.

Wilders calls for a full investigation on the matter, to prevent any conflicts of interest or the appearance thereof; many, however, do not expect the issue to have any consequences since a missing entry on the register is not in violation of any laws.

But the question remains: is such a register and, in general, transparency rules of any use if it is up to individual MPs to abide by them?

What do you think? Let us know in the comments!
Aurora Signorazzi
Aurora Signorazzi
Aurora comes from the majestic Italian capital, and is working on her PhD in virology at the University of Groningen. She has been living in the Netherlands for four years and is by now familiar with many Dutch habits... But still finds plenty of reasons to be pleasantly amazed (most of the time) by this industrious country and its brutally honest inhabitants!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related posts

Latest posts

Here’s how to check into Dutch public transport with your bank card

Hoera! Starting January 31, you can check into NS trains using your debit or credit card. This means that, for the first time, contactless...

The Netherlands is getting rid of its deer farms after new breeding ban

Minister Adema has decided that, from January 1, 2024, deer camps may no longer use the animals for breeding in the Netherlands. As a result,...

6 influencers you didn’t know were actually Dutch

From YouTube to Instagram to TikTok — the Dutch are taking the world of social media by storm. Haven’t come across any Dutch influencers...

It's happening

Upcoming events

The latest Dutch news.
In your inbox.