Dutch court finds Geert Wilders guilty

Dutch court finds Geert Wilders guilty of inciting discrimination and insulting a racial group.

 

On the 19th of March 2014, Geert Wilders asked a crowd of supporters whether they wanted more or less Moroccans in the Netherlands. The crowd had been previously instructed to respond with “less, less, less!”. Within a month over 5000 Dutch citizens had reported his statements as a crime prompting a court case that has now resulted in a verdict partially rendering Geert Wilders guilty.

 

On two separate occasions the Dutch’s favorite populist/futuristic hairstyle model Geert Wilders made statements that resulted in charges of inciting discrimination and insulting a group or race. The court has judged him guilty of these crimes in one out of two occasions. In all of its wisdom the court has decided to render no punishment, claiming that the guilty verdict was punishment enough.

Geert Wilders is both the founding, and only, member of the Freedom Party which currently holds 15 seats in Parliament and seems poised for a strong election result in March 2017.

 

Free speech and race

Wilders’ main strategy during his trial was to frame his comments in the context of free speech. During his final plea Wilders said that “this trial against me stinks from all sides. In Turkey or Iran a trial against a member of opposition such as this one would be fitting”. Indeed on multiple occasions in both the media and in court Wilders has made such claims. In a column written by Wilders before the trial began he claimed it was “a political persecution”.

Against the charges of racism, the Dutch paper NRC wrote that Wilders offered the following defense; “Moroccans are not a race. Who comes up with these things? I am not a racist. My voters are not racist. Do you think we have 7 million people that are racist in the Netherlands?”. The number of 7 million refers to a poll that found approximately half of Dutch citizens want less Moroccans in the country. Though it should be noted the poll was conducted by a man called Maurice de Hond, who is famous in the Netherlands for being terrible at his job.

To be continued?

Wilders will appeal the court verdict and has responded to the decision via a tweet.

 

And right after the tweets a youtube reaction followed (in English even – that’s not making Holland great again Geert!):
[embedyt] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_Vn_uHZvRw[/embedyt]

So what do you think? Did Wilders just used his freedom of speech or was it a clear cut case of racism? 

Kees van Dooren
Kees van Dooren
With ancestry going back to the days of ancient Germanic warriors, Kees is a Dutchman in every sense. He is now doing a masters in International Studies. He can often be spotted in the wild watching Stand-up comedy and reading about current affairs.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related posts

Latest posts

Rewards for injections? This may change Dutch attitudes towards the coronavirus vaccine

It's been the word on everybody's lips for the past few months — vaccines. With hundreds of people queuing for leftover vaccines, you would...

You have to pay: Netherlands against free PCR tests when travelling

As part of the aim to see travel between EU countries resume this summer, the EU Commission has proposed that compulsory PCR tests before...

Forgotten women painters of the Dutch Renaissance and Golden Age

The Netherlands is of course a land of art and museums. Countless museums showcase the works of famous Dutch Masters with many named after...
X