Court rules the Netherlands must reduce emissions faster

The court in The Hague has ruled that the Netherlands must reduce emissions faster. Here is why.

Holland must reduce emissions faster

The court in The Hague has determined that the Dutch State must do more to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases. The court dismissed all the claims of the national lawyer. One of his arguments included the fact that the Netherlands is only a small country and that climate change is a global problem.  The court acknowledged his argument, but also added that this “does not relieve the Netherlands of the obligation to make efforts from its territory to provide protection against climate change.” The fact that the Netherlands set itself the goal of reducing emissions by 49 percent by 2030, also did not mean much to the court.

Their decision also falls in line with the climate organization Urgenda. Urgenda demands that the State take measures so that the emission of greenhouse gases in 2020 is reduced by 25 percent. Last year, the reduction in emissions was 13 percent. According to the court, the Netherlands is on track to limit emissions by 23 percent. However, at the moment there is an important uncertainty margin of 19 to 27 percent.

The dangers of climate change

The court in The Hague further emphasizes that there is a “real threat” due to climate change. Therefore, the State has a duty to care for its citizens. The Netherlands must take measures to protect civilians “against industrial activities”.

If there is no intervention, there is a risk that “the current generation is faced with loss of life or disruption of family life”. The court also mentioned the long-term dangers of climate change in the Netherlands. These include floods, respiratory diseases, infectious diseases, droughts, forest fires, disruption of food and drinking water supplies and the damage to ecosystems.

“The Greenhouse Effect” in: “Introduction,” in: US EPA (December 2012) Climate Change Indicators in the United States, 2nd edition[1], Washington, DC, USA: US EPA, p.3. EPA 430-R-12-004.
What do you think of the court’s decision that the Netherlands must reduce emissions faster? Let us know in the comments below!

Veronika Licheva
Veronika Licheva
Living the short girl life in the land of giants. Veronika is a content creator who takes great interest in video, photography, and journalism. Her mission in The Netherlands is to build a vibrant and exciting career, while simultaneously petting as many dogs as possible.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related posts

Latest posts

Student societies in the Netherlands: what you need to know

The Netherlands has an incredibly rich student life, where students are encouraged to take on extracurricular activities. These are mostly in the form of...

Relaxations are back on the table: Dutch terraces may reopen by April 28

The road to the relaxation of coronavirus restrictions has hardly been smooth in the Netherlands. However, the government’s brand new five-step plan towards a...

King’s Day trial event with 10,000 people is cancelled

After over 30,000 people in the Netherlands petitioned for its cancellation, the municipality of Breda has denied the King's Day event a permit.  The 538...